Skip to main content

Cosmopolis and Privilege

In the book "Cosmopolis" by Don Delillo, Eric Packer is a ludicrously rich head of a financial firm who rides around in his limousine all day on his way to get a haircut. Outside the vehicle, the world around him rages and writhes in turmoil. People fill the streets protesting capitalism, but all Packer feels is amusement. This lack of empathy is a symptom of Eric's privilege. His privilege is a trait he has built upon with every dollar he's gained and luxury he's bought. Every ordinary event and interaction is now seen through new eyes; ones less attuned to the hearts of those struggling to get by. He sees the events around him as a spectacle, and uses the windows of the limo not only as a protective shell but also as a socioeconomic disconnect from the world around him. To Packer, everything he sees through the window is a stage set for him to interpret at his leisure, and only those he rides with are the selected audience members. One such audience member is Shiner, his security guard who travels with him at all times. Shiner is a bridge between worlds in the story, a man with a job that requires muscle, but who frequently communicates with Packer. This makes him both an observer and a participant, as he is exposed to the dangers and whims of the outside world, but also carries some of the same filter of privilege that Packer bears. Packer has one humanizing element though, one that runs throughout the entire story and in-fact drives the plot (and limo) forward. He wants a haircut, but not just any cheap shave. He wants one from a little barbershop across town, not elegant or fancy in any way. This is a symbol that deep down, Packer has the core of an every-man, a middle class American, but one who's vision is still clouded by his status and standing. Packer treats most of those around him with disregard, but this one barber, he treats with uncommon respect. It's a window, a hole in his ozone, to his true character. Just for a short time, Packer rolls down his bulletproof window and we see the real Packer within. We only see a flicker of him in the shadowy interior, but as the reader we know he's there. To the reader, this book is alarming not only because of Packer's lack of humanity, but because it shows us just how easy it can be to slip into the same cushy shoes he wears. In reality, the author attempts to show us, all it would take would be a bit of spending money and a high seat to sit on.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Week 14 - Social Media (Why are we embracing studio culture?)

One cause which I really care about as an animator is the current state of the VFX industry. To understand the full story of how the industry, and the artist who work in it are being abused, watch the 2014 movie “Life after Pi” . Basically, every major movie uses VFX and digital art extensively, in every scene. Most live-action movies have at least one digital element in each shot, and this means lots of work for VFX artists. However, this large demand unfortunately means overworking respected VFX studios, or outsourcing work to countries where workers are similarly abused. The schedules that digital artists in the film industry keep are massively unhealthy, and the stress that these schedules put on them and their relationships are even more obscene. For anyone entering the industry, their choice is either to accept an unstable position under a director who won’t look at their work until post is wrapping up, and then give you changes to do with no additional pay and without shifting...

Week 9 - The Voice of Wes Anderson

I watched “Fantastic Mr. Fox”, “The Grand Budapest Hotel” and “The Royal Tenenbaums”, three films by director Wes Anderson. Each movie showcases Anderson’s authorial voice, Budapest and Mr. Fox more-so than the Tenenbaums. These two movies are completely fictionalized, while “The Royal Tenenbaums” is in a more traditional building in a real city. Anderson’s later movies, one a piece of stop-motion animation and the other featuring a make-believe hotel, lend themselves to more imaginative situations, and therefore lends more freedom to the filmmaker to make many more creative choices with the filmmaking. In a world or a structure where the viewer is unfamiliar with the ‘rules’ of the universe, more can be done directorially before immersion is broken. This is important, because Anderson’s actors always behave strangely. By strangely, I mean speaking curtly and often formally, with long pauses. The dialogue is very secondary to the visual storytelling. It’s used to supplement the vi...

Week 8 - Being Director of Photography for "The Graduate"

I read the screenplay for “The Graduate” and immediately was captured by the strange dynamic between Ben and Mrs. Robinson. I got a good idea of the framing of the two within the shots as I read their parts. What’s interesting is their emotional distance when alone, but their secret closeness when among an unsuspecting crowd. If I were the Director of Photography, I would shoot around these two characters during most interactions, regardless of if a tertiary character was speaking. These scenes are always about how Mrs. Robinson feels about Ben’s behavior around her family, or how he presents himself. I would attempt to shoot mostly at eye-level to get a level of intimacy, and get both character’s in frame at a time. These shots could be facilitated by one character having their back to the other, which works contextually because they try to maintain a sense of unfamiliarity when around Mr. Robinson or Ben’s parents. You could have interactions happening in the background, but have t...