I read the screenplay for “The Graduate” and immediately was captured by the strange dynamic between Ben and Mrs. Robinson. I got a good idea of the framing of the two within the shots as I read their parts. What’s interesting is their emotional distance when alone, but their secret closeness when among an unsuspecting crowd. If I were the Director of Photography, I would shoot around these two characters during most interactions, regardless of if a tertiary character was speaking. These scenes are always about how Mrs. Robinson feels about Ben’s behavior around her family, or how he presents himself. I would attempt to shoot mostly at eye-level to get a level of intimacy, and get both character’s in frame at a time. These shots could be facilitated by one character having their back to the other, which works contextually because they try to maintain a sense of unfamiliarity when around Mr. Robinson or Ben’s parents. You could have interactions happening in the background, but have the largest compositional element in frame be a closeup of Mrs, R’s face. I would shoot Ben very on-axis because I want the viewer to sympathize with him. I think shooting him singularly would be acceptable too, as it lends itself to the feeling of isolation that his character feels throughout the screenplay.
I watched “Fantastic Mr. Fox”, “The Grand Budapest Hotel” and “The Royal Tenenbaums”, three films by director Wes Anderson. Each movie showcases Anderson’s authorial voice, Budapest and Mr. Fox more-so than the Tenenbaums. These two movies are completely fictionalized, while “The Royal Tenenbaums” is in a more traditional building in a real city. Anderson’s later movies, one a piece of stop-motion animation and the other featuring a make-believe hotel, lend themselves to more imaginative situations, and therefore lends more freedom to the filmmaker to make many more creative choices with the filmmaking. In a world or a structure where the viewer is unfamiliar with the ‘rules’ of the universe, more can be done directorially before immersion is broken. This is important, because Anderson’s actors always behave strangely. By strangely, I mean speaking curtly and often formally, with long pauses. The dialogue is very secondary to the visual storytelling. It’s used to supplement the vi...
Comments
Post a Comment